Winemaker’s Notes – Translated
Oct 13th, 2009 by Alana

To learn more about wine, I like reading the winemaker’s notes either at the tasting room or on the back of a bottle. When I was first learning, I read the notes first to help me recognize the flavors–very helpful! Now, I taste first and then see if the winemaker’s notes are congruent with my opinion.
I prefer brief descriptors like cherry, citrus, smokey. I also like to know if a wine has been barreled in American or French oak or stainless steel. (American oak imparts more oak flavor than French.) By knowing how old the barrels are and how long the wine was in contact with the oak, I can determine how much oak flavor to expect.
I love this wine and the winemaker’s notes are quite entertaining:
While philosophically related to the 2003 Russian River Valley bottling, the 2004 shows a marked increase in complexity and richness. Pure high-toned notes of pear blossom, Fuji apple and lemon curd are evident in the aromas, overlaying hints of anise, nutmeg, wet stone and pencil shavings. Oak is present but restrained, serving its proper supporting role. These flavors are reinforced on the palate, where white peach and apricot are at the forefront, complemented by hazelnut and a hint of toasted brioche. The long, delicate finish is fruit-driven with a hint of spice. The medium body and slightly creamy texture provide a nice counterpoint to the bright acidity.
My reaction? Fuji apple – not just any apple? Lemon curd not just lemon? Wet stone and pencil shavings? I hope not! Love the line about oak playing its proper supporting role. I don’t taste white peach or apricot in this wine, but another way of putting it – stone fruit. A hint of toasted brioche? Not just toast mind you!
Regardless, I paired this with Salmon & Pineapple Salsa and loved it. I was familiar with the wine and knew what my palette thought about it. When in doubt, open the bottle and try some before cooking.


